Drumroll, please!
You might assume this pattern is inherent to streaming. It isn't. The reader acquisition, the lock management, and the { value, done } protocol are all just design choices, not requirements. They are artifacts of how and when the Web streams spec was written. Async iteration exists precisely to handle sequences that arrive over time, but async iteration did not yet exist when the streams specification was written. The complexity here is pure API overhead, not fundamental necessity.，详情可参考51吃瓜
（二）提供服务器托管、空间租用、云服务的，应当采取监测发现、阻断、处置违法信息、网站、应用程序，拒绝服务攻击、恶意代码、僵尸网络，非法设立的虚拟专用网络等措施；，推荐阅读WPS下载最新地址获取更多信息
Node.js already had its own streaming API at the time that was ported to also work in browsers, but WHATWG chose not to use it as a starting point given that it is chartered to only consider the needs of Web browsers. Server-side runtimes only adopted Web streams later, after Cloudflare Workers and Deno each emerged with first-class Web streams support and cross-runtime compatibility became a priority.
The attack is trivial. An attacker visits your website, views the page source, and copies your AIza... key from the Maps embed. Then they run: